{"id":780,"date":"2013-11-11T12:27:18","date_gmt":"2013-11-11T11:27:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/becpp.org\/blog\/?p=780"},"modified":"2013-11-11T20:56:55","modified_gmt":"2013-11-11T19:56:55","slug":"know-your-tools-speed-comparison-between-c-compilers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/becpp.org\/blog\/2013\/11\/11\/know-your-tools-speed-comparison-between-c-compilers\/","title":{"rendered":"Know your tools: speed comparison between C++ compilers"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>As compilers continuously evolve, developers have new expectations on compilation speed, generated code performance and standards compliance.<\/p>\n<p>Slashdot has published their own benchmarks that pit Intel C++, G++ and LLVM Clang against each other. The benchmark is tailored to modern C++ development needs and involves code using both the\u00a0<a title=\"Threading Building Blocks\" href=\"https:\/\/www.threadingbuildingblocks.org\/\">TBB<\/a> and the\u00a0<a title=\"Cilk Plus\" href=\"https:\/\/www.cilkplus.org\/\">Cilk Plus<\/a>\u00a0parallel processing libraries. Quite a bit of template heavy metaprogramming code has also been included to test the compilation time performance. In total, over 6000 lines of code have been fed to each compiler.<\/p>\n<p>The results? They might just surprise you. Read all about them\u00a0<a title=\"Speed Test: Comparing Intel C++, GNU C++, and LLVM Clang Compilers\" href=\"http:\/\/slashdot.org\/topic\/bi\/speed-test-comparing-intel-c-gnu-c-and-llvm-clang-compilers\/\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Source: <a title=\"SlashDot\" href=\"slashdot.org\">slashdot.org<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As compilers continuously evolve, developers have new expectations on compilation speed, generated code performance and standards compliance. Slashdot has published their own benchmarks that pit Intel C++, G++ and LLVM Clang against each other. The benchmark is tailored to modern C++ development needs and involves code using both the\u00a0TBB and the\u00a0Cilk Plus\u00a0parallel processing libraries. Quite [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"pgc_sgb_lightbox_settings":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-780","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/becpp.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/780","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/becpp.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/becpp.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/becpp.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/becpp.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=780"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/becpp.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/780\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":781,"href":"https:\/\/becpp.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/780\/revisions\/781"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/becpp.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=780"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/becpp.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=780"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/becpp.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=780"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}